One of the music industry’s oldest conspiracy theories was put to the test a few days ago by the UK’s ‘Daily Mail’ which claims it has ‘evidence’ to prove that former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney is alive and well and not a replacement for the original ‘Paul’ who “died” back in the mid-1960s.
The web-article states that:
On the cover of the band’s ‘Abbey Road’ album, Macca is barefoot, supposedly indicating that he had died and been replaced by a body double.
Now, however, a photograph has come to light which supports McCartney’s own explanation – that he had merely kicked off his sandals because it was a hot summer’s day.
The picture used on the album cover was one of several taken near Abbey Road studios in London during the shoot by Scots photographer Iain Macmillan in 1969.
One of the ‘out-takes’ – which will go under the hammer this month – clearly shows a shoed McCartney walking with his fellow Beatles.
The picture, one of less than 25 prints thought to have survived, will be sold later this month.
London-based auction house Bloomsbury has put a ‘conservative’ estimate of £10,000 on the image.
According to a theory at the time, McCartney had died in an accident and been replaced. Conspiracy theorists believed the Abbey Road cover contained clues, as the band wanted to reveal the truth of their guilty secret.
John Lennon, in white was seen as a preacher leading a funeral procession, Ringo Starr’s black outfit indicated an undertaker, while a denim-clad George Harrison was the grave-digger.
This left McCartney as the corpse because he was barefoot and out of step with the rest of the band.
You can read the ‘Daily Mail’ article in it’s entirety here:
The ‘Paul is Dead’ theory (also known by enthusiasts as, “P.I.D.”), gathered momentum just prior to the UK release of the ‘Abbey Road’ album on September 26th 1969. It gained such notoriety, that it was even reported on by mainstream news channels all across the world at the time including America’s ABC and NBC networks.
In November of that year, McCartney responded to the rumours of his demise by agreeing to an interview with ‘Life’ magazine in which he insisted that his decision to walk barefoot for the ‘Abbey Road’ photo-shoot was because “it was a hot day.” He also said:
“Perhaps the rumour started because I haven’t been much in the press lately. I have done enough press for a lifetime, and I don’t have anything to say these days. I am happy to be with my family and I will work when I work. I was switched on for ten years and I never switched off. Now I am switching off whenever I can. I would rather be a little less famous these days.”
The rumours of Paul’s supposed death in a road crash appear to originate from a mixture of reports and rumours that reach back as early as the mid 1960s. One of the claims is that McCartney met his death after storming out of the Abbey Road studios in London shortly after 5am on November 9th 1966 following an argument with the rest of The Beatles during a recording session. It’s said he sped off in a fit of rage in his Aston Martin and consequently failed to notice that some traffic lights had changed. His car spun out of control and smashed into a pole at full speed decapitating him in the process.
Fearful of the effect Paul’s death would have on the future of The Beatles’ monumental success, the band and their manager, Brian Epstein decided to stage a cover-up and hired a replacement who’d supposedly won a McCartney look-a-like contest. Some claim the impostor’s name was William Campbell, although others have said he was actually called William Shears, the very same “Billy Shears” as sung by The Beatles in the closing section of the title track on their ’Sgt. Pepper’ album. Paul’s replacement has also been referred to as William Sheppard, which is interesting considering that the cover of the ‘Life’ magazine article above shows “McCartney’s” step-daughter, Heather holding a shepherd’s crook in her hand (another ‘clue‘ perhaps?).
It’s said The Beatles wanted to break the news of Paul’s untimely death to fans gently and gradually via ’clues’ in songs and album covers. For example, the line, “he blew his mind out in a car, he didn’t notice that the lights had changed” from the 1967 song, ’A Day in the Life’ was said to be a reference to Paul’s decapitation after he failed to stop at red lights. John Lennon however, has always maintained that this section was inspired by the death of his and Paul’s friend, the ‘Guiness’ heir Tara Browne in a car accident in December 1966. Lennon said, “I didn’t copy the accident. Tara didn’t blow his mind out, but it was in my mind when I was writing that verse. The details of the accident in the song – not noticing traffic lights and a crowd forming at the scene – were similarly part of the fiction.”
There is no hard evidence to suggest that there was an incident in November 1966 involving McCartney’s Aston Martin. In fact, it’s claimed Paul was holidaying in Kenya at the time with his then girlfriend, the actress, Jane Asher.
There are also reported rumours that his Mini Cooper was written-off after it crashed on the M1 motorway outside London on January 7th 1967. This has been further reinforced by Jim Yoakum a writer who’s also the literary executor of the estate of Monty Python member Graham Chapman. In his 2000 article, ‘The Man Who Killed Paul McCartney,’ he writes about a Moroccan by the name of Mohammed Chtaibi who claims he was the only occupant inside the aforementioned Mini on the night of the alleged crash. Chtaibi (formerly known as, Mohammed Hadjij) was a young student at the time and in the employ of Robert Fraser, a hip London art dealer who was friends with many of the Pop stars of that era – including The Beatles.
The two of them visited McCartney’s London flat on the day the road accident was said to have occurred for an impromptu party. They were later joined by Rolling Stones Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Brian Jones and the nephew of the former British Governor of Rhodesia, Christopher Gibbs. Following some hours of voracious drug-taking, they all decided to make their way to ‘Redlands,’ Richards’ secluded country mansion in Sussex, where they could continue their partying without any disturbances. Despite there being three available cars parked up on McCartney’s property, it’s said they all attempted to pile into Jagger’s Mini Cooper. Not surprisingly, it wasn’t long before they discovered that all seven of them couldn’t quite fit inside and it was then on Hadjij‘s suggestion that they eventually agreed to take a second vehicle with them to lighten the load. It’s claimed Paul gave the young Moroccan the keys to his Mini Cooper and suggested he follow them to ‘Redlands’ alone. He also handed Hadjij a large box shaped like a book but with a hollowed-out middle that was filled with hashish, cocaine, heroin and Acid. What none of them realised was that Hadjij accidentally left the car’s seat-belt dangling outside of the vehicle upon closing the door. Later on in the journey, another car began to overtake him and drove over the belt, Hadjij felt the Mini being pulled towards the vehicle beside him. The drug-addled Moroccan compensated for this by pulling the steering wheel in the opposite direction at which point the passing car drove off the belt and caused McCartney’s Mini to fly through the air and into a large metal streetlight. Some moments later, a heavily injured Hadjij awoke from his unconsciousness, climbed out of the wreckage and disposed of the box of drugs by throwing it down a nearby ravine fully realising the implications should it be found by police investigating the crash.
It’s said that the spectators who eventually turned up and saw the vehicle, immediately identified it as McCartney‘s state-of-the-art Mini Cooper, and when they noticed a dark-haired man covered in blood being placed into an ambulance, they assumed it was none other than the Beatle himself.
There are one or two questions that should perhaps be directed towards Hadjij’s claims. Firstly, he says he suffered multiple cuts, bruises and other injuries. However, he still managed to climb out of the wreckage just moments after waking from unconsciousness, then hobble down a highway, scale a high barrier fence and traffic island in order to throw a box of drugs down a ravine. Secondly, according to Yoakum’s accounts, the witnesses who saw Hadjij and mistook him for McCartney recall seeing him being pulled out of the wrecked Mini. So, assuming that he’d previously climbed out of the car in order to dispose of the notorious box, did he then climb back in again? Would this even have been possible? After all, aren’t Minis small, lightweight vehicles? Wouldn’t the damage inflicted in such a dramatic crash have left it almost mangled beyond recognition? If so, what was it that remained visible and recognisable enough to convince onlookers that it was McCartney’s Mini as is claimed by Yoakum and Hadjij?
Regardless of these questions, it’s possible that the ‘Paul is Dead’ rumours might’ve been born from this incident, for example, the following item in the Beatles’ official fanzine, ‘Beatles Monthly’ in February 1967 cites a crash on the M1 in January of that year involving McCartney‘s Mini Cooper and his subsequent “death“:
It’s interesting to note the news-item featured above with the headline, ‘Moustaches All Round,’ which reports on The Beatles’ collective decision to sport facial hair, because McCartney has since revealed that their reasons for donning this look appear to stem from a moped crash in December 1965. He said:
“I had an accident when I came off a moped in Wirral, near Liverpool. I had a very good friend who lived in London called Tara Browne, a Guinness heir – a nice Irish guy, very sensitive bloke. I’d see him from time to time, and enjoyed being around him. He came up to visit me in Liverpool once when I was there seeing my dad and brother. I had a couple of mopeds on hire, so we hit upon the bright idea of going to my cousin Bett’s house.
We were riding along on the mopeds. I was showing Tara the scenery. He was behind me, and it was an incredible full moon; it really was huge. I said something about the moon and he said ‘yeah’, and I suddenly had a freeze-frame image of myself at that angle to the ground when it’s too late to pull back up again: I was still looking at the moon and then I looked at the ground, and it seemed to take a few minutes to think, ‘Ah, too bad – I’m going to smack that pavement with my face!’ Bang!
There I was, chipped tooth and all. it came through my lip and split it. But I got up and we went along to my cousin’s house. When I said, ‘Don’t worry, Bett, but I’ve had a bit of an accident,’ she thought I was joking. She creased up laughing at first, but then she went ‘Holy…!’ I’d really given my face a good old smack; it looked like I’d been in the ring with Tyson for a few rounds. So she rang a friend of hers who was a doctor.
He came round on the spot, took a needle out and, after great difficulty threading it, put it in the first half of the wound. He was shaking a bit, but got it all the way through, and then he said, ‘Oh, the thread’s just come out – I’ll have to do it again!’ No anaesthetic. I was standing there while he rethreaded it and pulled it through again.
In fact that was why I started to grow a moustache. It was pretty embarrassing, because around that time you knew your pictures would get winged off to teeny-boppery magazines like 16, and it was pretty difficult to have a new picture taken with a big fat lip. So I started to grow a moustache – a sort of Sancho Panza – mainly to cover where my lip had been sewn.
It caught on with the guys in the group: if one of us did something like growing his hair long and we liked the idea, we’d all tend to do it.”
What McCartney has failed to mention is the fact that neither he nor the rest of The Beatles grew moustaches until late 1966/early 1967 – a full year after his accident, by which time the “big fat lip“ had disappeared.
Some theorists believe that the ‘fake’ McCartney grew the moustache as a form of disguise because, although his face was almost identical to the ’real’ Paul’s, it wasn’t entirely accurate. Others suggest the facial hair was to hide scars that William Campbell/Sheppard/Shears had received from plastic surgery.
Here’s an interesting photo of McCartney from the front-page of the ‘Beatles Monthly’ fanzine in March 1967 showing him sporting a moustache:
Now here’s exactly the same picture of Paul from 1966 – without the moustache:
Assuming the fanzine picture hasn’t been doctored since it’s original publication, the most obvious question to ask is, why did they do this?
The rumours of Paul’s death simmered away beneath the surface for a number of years – that is until September 17th 1969, when an article titled, ‘Is Beatle Paul McCartney Dead?’ was published in a student newspaper at an American university. It was written by Timothy Harper. Speaking in 2010, he said, “I was, and still am, a reporter, a journalist. I heard some people talking about the rumour, and it sounded like a good story. So I did some reporting, and wrote a story for the school paper. It’s a simple as that.” Timothy has always maintained that he doesn’t believe in the rumour himself, and had no intention of advocating it. He says, “I didn’t generate a hoax. I reported on a rumour. I said then, and still say, no one knows how the rumour started.”
Harper says the main source and inspiration for his article was a fellow student by the name of Dartanyan Brown who told him that he heard about the rumours from musicians who he was sharing lodgings with. He also recalled reading about the “death” claims in a number of underground newspapers that were in circulation at the time, although this has never been substantiated.
In his article, Harper documents the so-called “clues” that are still discussed and examined to this day. He writes:
“Lately on campus there has been much conjecturing on the present state of Beatle Paul McCartney. An amazing series of photos and lyrics on the group’s albums point to a distinct possibility that McCartney may indeed be insane, freaked out, even dead.
The ‘Sergeant Pepper’ album, obviously, signified the ‘death’ of the old Beatles who made girls scream when they sang ‘yeah yeah yeah!” The new Beatles blew Grass and dropped Acid, criticised religion, studied under Maharishi in India, and had a new sound.”
“This album also started the hints that all was not right with The Beatles, especially Paul. On the front cover a mysterious hand is raised over his head, a sign many believe is an ancient death symbol of either the Greeks or the American Indians…”
“Also, a left-handed guitar (Paul was the only lefty of the four) lies on the grave at the group’s feet…”
“On the back of the same album, George, Ringo and John are smiling out toward the camera, but McCartney has his back turned…”
“The Beatles’ next album, ‘Magical Mystery Tour,’ displayed a major idiosyncrasy. On the front of this album all four are dressed in walrus suits, after the top tune on the record, ‘The Walrus.’ No faces are visible, but three of the walrus suits are grey; the other is black…”
“Inside, under the words, ‘The Walrus,’ there is a phrase saying Paul is the walrus, not John, who sings the song.
Then came the group’s latest album: ‘The Beatles,’ with an all-white cover. With this record the whole mystery became even more spooky. On the tune ‘Revolution No. 9,’ there is a part where a lone deep voice repeats ‘number nine.’ When this is played backwards a voice quotes “Turn me on, dead man,’ and ‘Cherish the dead,’ and there are many sound effects, including the noise of a spectacular auto crash. In another song on the record, ‘Glass Onion,’ the Beatles sing ‘Here is another clue for you all: The walrus was Paul.’”
Just weeks after Timothy Harper’s article was published, a student at East Michigan University by the name of Tom Zarski telephoned DJ Russ Gibb whilst he was broadcasting on the radio-station WKNR and informed him live on air that Paul McCartney was dead. He then instructed him to play ‘Revolution No. 9’ backwards. Speaking in 2011, Gibb said, “when you played it backwards, it said, ‘Turn me on, dead man… Turn me on, dead man… Turn me on, dead man.’ That floored me. It wasn’t garbled – it was very distinct. I put that on and within 3-4 minutes, the phone lines were jammed in my studio.”
Gibb also remembers that another caller to the station suggested he play the end of the song ‘Strawberry Fields Forever’ backwards to hear John Lennon say: “I buried Paul.” Incidentally, McCartney has since said that his former band-mate was actually muttering the words, “cranberry sauce.” Be that as it may, the listeners of WKNR on that fateful October night were clamouring for more. Gibb recalls the owner of the radio-station, Frank Maruca wanted to capitalise on the sudden influx of callers. He says, “by now, people were pounding on the windows. Callers were giving me more clues. Frank said, ‘Whatever you’re doing, keep doing it.’ He realised the numbers were skyrocketing… Frank came and said, ‘milk it.’ He was a genius programmer. So now the other DJs are getting in on it because people were calling.”
Fred LaBour, an arts reviewer for the student newspaper ‘The Michigan Daily’ was listening to the show. When he was assigned to write an article about the new Beatles album ‘Abbey Road’ some days later, he decided to compose a satire about the P.I.D. claims. In the 2005 documentary ‘Who Buried Paul?’ LaBour says, “I invented a lot of the clues. So I just imagined this whole scenario and wrote it as sort of a quasi-news story with a lot of facts, and enough facts that were true to sort of keep pulling you along and enough facts that weren’t true that hopefully would let you know that this was a joke. This was a satire.” In another interview he revealed that he invented the William Campbell character. He says, “I made the guy up. It was originally going to be Glenn Campbell, with two Ns, and then I said ‘that’s too close, nobody’ll buy that’. So I made it William Campbell.”
Within days, LaBour’s article and the rumours of Paul’s supposed death had attracted the attentions of the international press with reports in the London ’Times’ newspaper as well as the ’New York Times’ and the ’Los Angeles Times.’
All the media attention prompted a number of cynics to conclude that the rumours and “clues” in the songs and artwork were perhaps an elaborate publicity-stunt orchestrated by The Beatles themselves to sell more copies of their new record. The band denied these accusations. In a 1970 magazine article, Lennon talked about P.I.D. He said, “I don’t know where that started, that was barmy. I don’t know, you know as much about it as me… No, that was bulls**t, the whole thing was made up. We never went for anything like that… I know we used to have a few things, but nothing that could be interpreted like that.” Even so… a question mark over The Beatles’ involvement remains, no doubt further fuelled by a song titled ‘Saint Paul’ performed by Terry Knight which some believe is about Paul’s death. What makes it more intriguing, is that it was published by John Lennon’s and Paul McCartney’s ‘Maclen Music’ four months before Timothy Harper’s attention-grabbing article was first published.
‘SAINT PAUL’ (lyrics):
I looked into the sky
Everything was high
Higher than it seemed to be to me
Standing by the sea
Thinking I was free
Did I hear you call or was I dreaming then, St. Paul?
You knew it all along
Something had gone wrong
They couldn’t hear your song of sadness in the air
While they were crying out, “beware”
Your flowers & long hair
While you & Sgt. Pepper saw the writing on the wall
You say you want to live your life to the future
They say they’ve got dues to pay today
You say it’s the fool who plays it cool, Sir
And if tomorrow comes, you know, they’ll all hear St. Paul say:
Let me take you down
You have a different view
Hey there, Paul, what’s new?
Did Judas really talk to you
or did you put us on?
I think there’s something wrong
It’s taking you too long
To change the world
Sir Isaac Newton said it had to fall
Hey St. Paul!
You say you want to live your life to the future
They say they’ve got dues to pay today
You say it’s the fool who plays it cool, Sir
And if tomorrow comes, you know, they’ll all hear St Paul say:
I read the news today, oh boy.
You had a different view
Hey there, Paul, what’s new?
Did Judas talk to you
or did you put the whole world on?
I think there’s something wrong
It’s taking you too long to change the world
Sir Isaac Newton told you it would fall
You didn’t listen, St. Paul!
Were The Beatles attempting to kick-start the rumour gravy-train? Well… according to official accounts, apparently not.
It’s claimed Knight had met The Beatles at Abbey Road studios in 1968 during the making of their ‘White Album.’ Noticing the growing tension between the group, he later returned home to America thinking about what he’d witnessed and also feeling a certain sympathy for McCartney. Others claim Knight had met Paul in February 1969 and had hoped to be signed to The Beatles’ ‘Apple’ record label, but, when this didn‘t materialise, he subsequently wrote ‘Saint Paul’ on the flight back to New York.
The song was eventually released by ‘Capitol Records,’ the sister-company of ‘EMI’ which (coincidentally?) distributed The Beatles’ music. However, when the band discovered that Knight’s song contained a number of lyrical references to ‘Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds,’ ‘She Loves You,’ and a nod towards ‘Hey Jude,’ they threatened ‘Capitol’ with legal action. As a result, the record was pulled from distribution and later re-issued in conjunction with ‘Maclen,’ one of the few (if not, only) times that a non-Lennon/McCartney song has been included in the company’s catalogue.
Terry Knight’s ‘Saint Paul’ continues to spark debate. Some believe it was written by the “fake” McCartney – or, perhaps the entire Beatles – as a secret message to their fans.
Since the dawn of the internet age, the P.I.D. rumours have blossomed. There are now hundreds of websites, videos and forums examining, discussing and debating what has become one of the longest running conspiracy theories in modern history. Thanks to the easy accessibility of photographs and film footage on the worldwide web, millions of people have added yet more clues and apparent anomalies into the mix. Questions have now arisen regarding the physical appearance of the “fake” McCartney (now known to all as, “Faul”) when compared to the “real” version such as inconsistencies in the shapes of their noses, ears, eyes and skulls and apparent differences in their height. Here are just some of the examples…
There are also those attempting to debunk the rumours by comparing photographs of Paul from the early 1960s to pictures of him post-1966 “car crash”…
Finally, more clues in the artwork…
Perhaps more compelling than any photograph, album-cover or song lyric, is the allegation made in 1984 by a German woman who claimed that McCartney had arranged for a look-alike to take part in the faking of a paternity test. Erika Hübers had previously failed in a 1983 court-case to convince the judge that the famous musician was the father of her 21-year-old daughter Bettina who was allegedly conceived in the early 1960s when The Beatles were still an unknown band working in the clubs of Hamburg. In an appeal hearing in 1984, she argued that the blood sample taken from McCartney was not McCartney but an impostor. Court officials however were adamant the results of the test were genuine adding that the former Beatle’s fingerprints were also taken. The case was dismissed.
In 2007, Erika’s daughter assumed control and succeeded in convincing German prosecutors to investigate the claims of him faking the paternity test. She told reporters that “the signature in the old documents is false. We have found the signature is from a right-handed person, but Paul is left-handed.” However, just days later, German authorities dropped the investigation claiming the case was “beyond their legal powers.” Michael Grunwald from the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Berlin told reporters that, “the case falls outside the statute of limitations even if her claims are true. The investigation is closed.”
There were more startling claims to come.
In 2008, Paul and his second wife, Heather Mills were embroiled in a bitter and very public divorce battle in the courts following their break-up in 2006. In leaked documents, she complained that her estranged husband was a cannabis-smoking drunk who stabbed her with a broken wine glass, and pushed her into a bathtub when she was pregnant with their daughter Beatrice. However, it was during an interview for the UK breakfast show ‘GMTV’ that she revealed her most astonishing allegation of all. She told TV presenters that she has a “box of evidence” that will go to “a certain person” should she be ‘topped off,’ and added that there is “such a fear from a certain party of the truth coming out.” Heather made similar claims to the BBC, telling reporters that she had received death threats. However, Kevin Moore, Chief Superintendent of Sussex Police informed journalists that Heather was running “the risk of being treated as the little boy who cried wolf“ and that officers had “to respond to a disproportionate high volume of calls” from her.
During her GMTV interview, Heather also talked about her treatment at the hands of the tabloid press and the accusations made against her by various media outlets that she was a liar, a “gold digger,” and a prostitute. One allegation in the newspaper, ’The News of the World’ named the Saudi billionaire businessman and controversial arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi as a former client of hers during her days as an alleged escort girl. Meanwhile, the newspaper journalist Heather Mills (no relation), accused her of falsely using her name and pretending to be her in order to secure a TV presenting job on the BBC. In his final judgement at the end of her divorce battle with Paul, Justice Bennett described her as a “kindly person” who argued her case with a “steely, yet courteous, determination“, but concluded that much of her evidence was, “not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid“, and that overall she was a “less than impressive witness.”
Many believe that the hostile reception from various quarters within the media is a deliberate attempt to discredit any future revelations she might have regarding the “death” of the “real” Paul McCartney.
As time has progressed, so have the theories pertaining to the alleged “death” of Paul McCartney. There are those that believe he was murdered because he refused to go along with the Illuminati plan to use The Beatles as a tool in the late 1960s to corrupt the world’s youth through the promotion of drugs and the worship of “false” New Age religions. Indeed, McCartney caused a furore in 1967 when he admitted taking LSD and later championed the legalisation of marijuana. Many observers were surprised that Paul, the so-called “clean-cut” and “cute” Beatle, was advocating such activities. In the same year, The Beatles also began to follow the guru, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and in the process, popularised Eastern mysticism.
As well as Heather’s “box of evidence,” there are promised revelations to come later this year from the best known P.I.D. researcher of them all; Iamaphoney. This elusive character initially gained notoriety through regular ‘YouTube’ postings of strange, esoteric and often eerie short films that pointed towards clues of Paul McCartney’s “death.” In 2010, a full-length movie titled, ‘TheWingedBeatle’ was released on the internet, and in the sequel set for release later this year, it’s been indicated that there is earth-shattering information to be revealed.
The DJ Russ Gibb, who helped spark the original rumours back in the late 1960s, has always maintained a sceptical attitude towards the P.I.D. rumours but has also claimed that he has a secret that could prove valuable in any future attempts to solve the decades-old mystery. In the 2005 documentary ‘Who Buried Paul McCartney’ he says, “there’s some things that are best said after we leave the planet. Understand? And so that’s basically what it is. There is one piece of information that somebody gave me in London about this whole story. I’m not sure if it’s key but it certainly is important, and I’ll let the people just guess at what it is until I put it down on paper – and I may never see it, and then The Beatles may not even be around, but someday it’ll come out.”
‘Conspiro Media’ awaits these developments with interest, because as it currently stands, there is little to be convinced of. For example, assuming that McCartney did die in 1966 and was replaced by an impostor, how is it possible that he has managed to successfully fool not only his brother and his father (who died in 1976), but also members of his large family in Liverpool who he visits on a regular basis? Surely, at least one of them would’ve recognised the difference? Who knows?… Maybe some did? It’s claimed McCartney’s girlfriend at the time, Jane Asher was paid to keep her silence. Not long later, their relationship ended after Paul (or is that William?) was caught dating future wife, Linda Eastman.
Granted, some of the evidence presented in album covers and various other Beatle-related artwork is compelling and thought-provoking, and who’s to say for sure that major debunkers of the story such as LaBour, Harper and Zarski aren’t actually in the pay of shadowy figures keen to keep the hoax accusations alive?
It’s also important to acknowledge that other well known figures have used doubles in order to deflect attention and to deceive the public, the most notable examples being Saddam Hussein and General “Monty” Montgomery. Perhaps McCartney is alive and well but has also seen fit to employ the occasional stand-in (such as in a paternity suit for example)?
There is a danger of course that those of us who’ve examined the so-called “clues” and then formed conclusions are totally missing the point and taking it all too literally? After all, many of the symbols and allegories in the music and artwork are of an esoteric nature and as such, could be suggesting “death” of a different kind? A symbolic death? Perhaps a spiritual death or rotting of the soul? Maybe a ‘supernatural’ possession of a living being?
As the saying goes, “there’s no smoke without fire,” and this particular “fire” has been burning for over 40 years, no doubt partly fuelled by the intriguing and compelling clues on offer.
Whilst ‘Conspiro Media’ is yet to be totally won over by all the elements that provide the framework for the alleged conspiracy, it does sense that there is enough data on offer to suggest that something mysterious or untoward is afoot.
The question is… what?
HERE ARE SOME USEFUL P.I.D. LINKS AND SOURCES OF INFO:
*) An informative, engaging P.I.D. discussion at the ‘Above Top Secret’ forum:
*) iamaphoney’s blog:
*) ‘TheWingedBeatle’ official website:
*) CRANBERRY SAUCE: An Examination of The PAUL IS DEAD Hoax
An original documentary by Matthew Hawes that gives a detailed and insightful look into one of the most bizzare chapters of Beatles history.
Follow along, listen and look at the many clues, and see what conclusions you come to about this fascinating subject.
Who was the Walrus? — Or is it just CRANBERRY SAUCE?
Written, edited, produced and directed by Matthew Hawes
*) “Who Buried Paul McCartney?”
In the late sixties the news about the death of Paul McCartney swept the world. But did Paul really die? This documentary explores the true story behind the Paul-is-dead mystery. Also features contributions from Fred LaBour, Russ Gibb, Timothy Harper and Tom Zarski.