Here’s a review of events from 2014 and a look ahead at what’s in store for ‘Conspiro Media’ in 2015 and beyond…

2015 Out with the Old In with the New

The initial idea that led to the formation of Conspiro Media was – in all honesty – much grander than what has transpired since the very first article was posted back in June 2011. The original concept was for the creation of a website brimming with topical content, a website complete with; 1) a constantly updated News Headlines page (with added blog commentary and analysis from time to time), 2) a section showcasing singers, rappers, musicians and remixers/producers of an Alternative nature who communicate a meaningful message (and who might not necessarily be widely-known), 3) a regular(ish) smattering of lengthy, in-depth articles, and 4) a YouTube channel featuring exclusive interviews with researchers, authors and others relevant to those of us seeking more information on the dark, arcane, symbol-ridden, plot-scheming (yet not always altogether negative) elements that are (and always have been) present in entertainment/media/The Arts. As its turned out, the last two ingredients in this ambitious wish-list have been achieved, but the first two havent. So, not the desired result of course, but by no means due to accident or disaster. Faced with the uphill challenge of building a large-scale website from scratch with absolutely no prior knowledge or experience on to how to achieve this, and mindful of the sheer amount of days, weeks and months that would pile up on the way to attaining this goal as a consequence, it was decided to go ahead with something less elaborate first. After all, why hold back on sharing information – any information that might be of value and/or relevance, however small or understated – just for the sake of a big idea that might not even materialise until a year (or more) down the line (if at all)? Best to engage modestly rather than never. Take each day as it comes and assess all progress regularly – test the waters, as it were ahead of any plans to expand as desired. And thats exactly whats been happening, and now, here we are with 2015 ahead of us, a period in time when folk make resolutions for the future and reflect on whats occurred in the previous twelve months Therefore, with all this in mind, its also time to issue an announcement here – and that is:

Conspiro Media is all set to begin its steps towards achieving that desired Grand Plan.

This is largely due to necessity.                                                                                               Why so? Well, one only need take a look back at the seemingly relentless stream of events that occurred during 2014 that were (are) worthy of note and that this site shouldve reacted to but couldnt and didnt; For starters, there were all those celebrity deaths, most of which were officially deemed as non-suspicious but that were met with doubt and even outright accusations of foul-play by the more Alternative-minded of us. It all began in February when Oscar-winning actor, Philip Seymour Hoffman was found dead in his Manhattan apartment due to a drug-fuelled accident. In August, comedy legend and film-star, Robin Williams was a victim of suicide, and earlier in April, O.T.O.-follower Peaches Geldof died of – in the words of the inquest-report – an unintentional heroin overdose. There was no indication that any third party was present or involved, it stated. Her death, however, came just months after shed Tweeted some provocative comments, observations and revelations with regards to Ian Watkins, the paedophile Rock-musician who was jailed in late-2013 for a string of child sex-offences including the attempted rape of a baby. Had she revealed too much? And what about the constant air of suspicion that hangs around her father, Sir Bob Geldof who, incidentally, faced something of a critical mauling from cynics in the closing weeks of last year in relation to his Band Aid 30 project? peaches geldof-His ex-wife (and Peaches mother), Paula Yates, died in September 2000 of an accidental overdose, 34 months after the suicide of the man shed left him for, 80s/90s Pop sensation, Michael Hutchence. In a police-statement following the INXS stars death, she branded the Boomtown Rats front-man evil, and claimed he had intimidated her by bragging that he was above the law. As numerous onlookers and commentators have opined, a significant number of people closely connected to this sainted individual have ended up dead before their time, and from ugly circumstances. 2014 also saw the passing of TV-host and comedian, Joan Rivers whilst reportedly undergoing minor throat-surgery at a Manhattan outpatient clinic. Interestingly, two months after she died there came accounts of a federal investigation that concluded shed lost her life due to the mistakes of doctors. This has no doubt fuelled suspicions that she was ultimately silenced for calling Barack Obama gay and his wife, Michelle a transgender (we all know) just weeks earlier when approached by an on-the-street reporter. Did the veteran celebrity, like Peaches Geldof before her, pay the ultimate price for her candidness?

The issue of Hollywood paedophilia garnered notable mainstream-media attention towards the end of 2014. This was when the US documentary, An Open Secret was revealed to the public for the first, and, – when considering the apparent content contained within it – possibly last time. Directed by Oscar-nominee Amy Berg, its said to incorporate the testimonies of several ex-child performers including one by the name of Evan H. He gives his account of his abuse at the hands of his then-manager, Marty Weiss who, at a pre-trial hearing in 2012, pleaded no contest to two felony-counts of oral-copulation with a child under the age of 14.

Amy Berg

Amy Berg

Of the few who say theyve seen the documentary, theres focus, so they claim, also placed on Hollywood talent-agents, Michael Harrah (whos apparently caught on a secret tape-recording admitting to making advances on a minor) and Bob Villard who once represented a young Leonardo DiCaprio. According to reports, this individual was among nine people indicted by a federal grand jury in 1987 on charges of transporting child-pornography. In 2001, he was sentenced to three years probation after searches of his home uncovered thousands of photographs of boys in skimpy bathing-suits posing in sexually suggestive positions. He pleaded no contest, as he is also said to have done in 2005 when he was handed an eight-year prison-term for committing a lewd act on a 13-year-old male who sought him out as an acting-coach. Perhaps the best-known of all the individuals placed under the spotlight of suspicion in the documentary is X-Men director, Bryan Singer whose name is linked to Marc Collins-Rector founder of the now-defunct web-TV company, Digital Entertainment Network and who, in 2004, reportedly pleaded guilty in a US District Court to transporting minors across State lines for the purpose of sex. He was notorious in Hollywood – so its said – for his pool-parties where young teenage boys mingled with powerful and successful entertainment/media-men. These get-togethers were referred to in a lawsuit filed against Singer in 2014 by a former male child-model. He claimed the director sexually-abused him at the California estate where these drink and drug-fuelled gatherings took place and then did the same to him in Hawaii in 1999 when he was 17. The allegations were denied, and in August last year, it was announced that the case had been dropped.

Bryan Singer

Bryan Singer

The move to dismiss was, said the accuser, Michael Egan III, little to do with the strength of (Singers) defence, but rather, it is a consequence of the current circumstances regarding my case, my lack of legal counsel, and my inability to proceed in this matter acting on my own behalf. Amy Berg has reportedly said he was the victim of a faulty lawyer and had made a poor decision regarding not only this particular sexual-abuse suit but three others which hed aimed – but then also withdrew – against seasoned TV-heads, David Neuman and Garth Ancier, and Broadway producer and former Disney employee, Gary Goddard.

And as if all this wasn t enough

In December 2014, Stephen Collins, the American screen-actor perhaps best-known to millions for his clean-cut roles in countless television-shows such as the long-running 7th Heaven (in which he played the part of a church-minister, incidentally), admitted publicly to molesting and/or exposing himself over the years to a total of three young girls all aged somewhere between eleven and thirteen. His confession to the US magazine/website, People came just months after an audio-tape was leaked to the media in which he was said to be heard discussing these incidents. It was recorded during a confidential marriage-therapy session in 2012 with his estranged wife, actress, Faye Grant and without – he claims – his knowledge or consent.

Stephen Collins

Stephen Collins

As it happens, 2014 was something of a year for abuse allegations either made by or against the celebrity set. The rape-accusations surrounding veteran comedian and TV-actor, Bill Cosby attracted the most attention, and still do. But there were other notables. For example, sometime during the end of last year, the broadcaster, Howard Stern asked Pop-star, Lady Gaga whether shed been raped by a record-producer at some point in her life. She answered the question with few specifics but did seem to imply nevertheless that – yes – she had been, when she was nineteen, by a man who was twenty years older than her. Shes reportedly denied claims that the as yet unnamed individual was none other than Dr. Luke, the 41-year-old songwriter and music-producer. He himself reacted to the accusations by launching a lawsuit for defamation against prominent criminal-attorney-to-the-stars, Mark Geragos who – so were led to understand – sent a number of strongly-suggestive Tweets (most of which, its said, have since been deleted) that alleged the Pop hit-maker was the rapist in question. I said it because its true, the lawyer told entertainment-news website TMZ after the Twitter posts were pounced on by the media. Furthermore, he revealed his intention to call in Lady Gaga to give evidence for one of his clients, fellow Pop-star, Kesha, who in October 2014 filed a lawsuit for sexual-assault and battery against Dr. Luke. According to her legal complaint, the music-producer, whos credited with playing a prominent role in her career from the beginning, has sexually, physically, verbally and emotionally abused her for the past ten years in order to destroy her self-confidence, self-image, and self-worth so that he could maintain complete control over her life and career. Theres also references to her stint in rehab in January to March last year. The continuous and ongoing years of sexually, physical, verbal and emotional abuse and harassment at the hands of Dr. Luke took their toll, it states. She was forced to seek emergency medical help. Dr. Lukes abuse had caused her to suffer from Bulimia Nervosa, an eating disorder Doctors at the facility told her and her family that the blood pressure and sodium levels were similar to levels found in patients following a heart attack or stroke. She suffered from psychological effects caused by Dr. Lukes abuse, including severe depression, post-traumatic stress, social isolation, and panic attacks. The psychological effects of the repeated abuse suffered were continuous and ongoing…” Sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, trauma well-worn words when describing the horrors experienced by an alleged Mind-Kontrolled Pop-puppet. She announced a change of identity of sorts after checking out of rehab; she reverted back to her birth-name, dropping the $ symbol for the letter s. Sources close to the celebrity were reported as saying the reason for this was because she was looking for a fresh start and the previous moniker reminded her of her old self. Make of that what you will. And likewise with regards to another star of sound and screen, Amanda Bynes. According to reports in October last year, she was admitted to a California hospital on an involuntary psychiatric-hold after posting a series of allegations against her father on Twitter, accusing him of physically, verbally and sexually abusing her. She then backtracked on these accusations shortly afterwards, Tweeting, my dad never did any of those things. The microchip in my brain made me say those things but hes the one that ordered them to microchip me. Strong stuff but perhaps not surprising when considering her back-story. Its one thats rife with details that you might collectively term, MK clues. For example, Bynes had been on the receiving-end of an involuntary psychiatric-hold prior to 2014. It happened in July of the previous year after she was involved in a series of often reckless and sometimes bizarre occurrences that included a drug-arrest, a number of motor-related episodes (for example, she was charged for two alleged hit-and-run incidents, although these were later dropped), and finally, a small fire that she was accused of starting in front of a strangers house in California and which was said to be the reason for her enforced hospitalisation after police were called. According to reports, a witness at the scene says they saw Bynes lying down near the driveway of the property with her left trouser-leg ablaze and exclaiming that her dog had been burned by the flames. There were also accounts that the animal in question was soaked in gasoline. During her spell on psychiatric-hold, TMZ stated that it had received information from sources that doctors had concluded the star was suffering from schizophrenic tendencies theres a good Amanda and a bad Amanda. The website reported that the star almost mimics an exorcism when talking about the bad Amanda, pulling at her body as if to remove the demon, and even biting herself. Furthermore, when hospital-staff quizzed her about the fire during a lucid spell when she was kind, quiet and nice her personality changed radically. She got frustrated and then shut down. Her fragile mental state was reportedly recognised by the courts which, as a result, accepted her parents request for temporary control of her personal affairs including her estate worth somewhere between three to over five million dollars. Once again, following her 2014 hospitalisation, they were granted conservatorship. This most recent move was slammed by Amanda on her release in October. She Tweeted, I am more than capable of handling my personal life and finances and I am enraged. Most interestingly of all, she then not only accused her mother and father of stealing money from her, but for doing so with the participation of an extremely notorious individual, an individual who she also held partly responsible for having her hospitalised, none other than Sam Lutfi. He was Britney Spearss so-called manager during her suspected MK meltdown back in 2007-2008 when she was, like Bynes years later, involved in a series of occasionally peculiar incidents that saw her shaving off all her hair, and attacking paparazzi with an umbrella before being put on – wait for it – psychiatric-hold. The Baby One More Time stars parents reportedly blamed him for his involvement in their daughters mental decline and slapped a restraining-order on him, stating, Mr. Lufti essentially moved into Britneys home and purported to take control of her life, home and finances. He also drugged Britney. Lufti – whos also been linked to other suspected MK-puppets including Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan – denied the accusations. Byness parents meanwhile are said to have rejected their daughters accusations that this so-called svengali was in any way plotting in league with them.

From top-left to right: Dr. Luke and Kesha pictured in 2011; Sam Lutfi and Britney Spears; Amanda Bynes circa 2013; Lady Gaga

Clockwise from top-left: Dr. Luke and Kesha pictured in 2011; Sam Lutfi and Britney Spears; Amanda Bynes circa 2013; Lady Gaga

As far as Conspiro Media can ascertain, 28-year-old Bynes is currently involved in a legal battle to win back control of her estate and personal affairs. A future article examining these events – as well as one focusing on the controversy surrounding Kesha, Lady Gaga and Dr. Luke – is most certainly being considered for inclusion on this site as is a feature on the role of the CIA in music. This will be in response to claims late last year that a firm based in Washington DC that works for the US Government-backed USAID (United States Agency for International Development) had secretly infiltrated Cubas underground Hip Hop movement for more than two years, recruiting unwitting rappers in a covert plot to spark youth unrest in Cuba and bring about regime-change in that country. The news-agency, Associated Press reported in 2014 that it had obtained documents, thousands of pages of contracts, e-mails, preserved chats, budgets, expense-reports, power-points, photographs and passports” directly linking this secret program to ’Creative Associates International, the aforementioned Washington firm. The AP states that “the idea was to use Cuban musicians ‘to break the information blockade’ and build a network of young people seeking ‘social change.’ At first, the Hip Hop operation was run in Cuba by Serbian contractor Rajko Bozic. His project was inspired by the protest concerts of the student movement that helped undermine former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic in 2000.” In Cuba, Bozic “homed in swiftly on Los Aldeanos, a Hip Hop group frustrated by official pressure and widely respected by Cuban youth for its hard-hitting lyrics. Creative used a Panama front-company and a bank in Lichtenstein to hide the money-trail from Cuba, where thousands of dollars went to fund a TV-programme starring Los Aldeanos. It would be distributed on DVDs to circumvent Cuba’s censors.” The forthcoming ‘Conspiro Media’ article will provide a recap of all the allegations put forward by the AP (for what you’ve read here thus far is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg) as well as taking a closer look at the notorious histories of both Creative Associates International and USAID, an agency that – according to its website – “works to end extreme global poverty and enable resilient, democratic societies to realise their potential.” It claims to go about this through a variety of efforts that – on the face of it – might appear innocent enough to the casual observer; It “invests in… providing life-saving assistance in the wake of disaster, investing in agriculture, health-systems.” It ‘believes in’ “promoting free, peaceful, and self-reliant societies with effective, legitimate governments.” However, since its formation in 1961 under the watch of President John F. Kennedy, it’s been accused of meddling covertly in overseas affairs whether it be by influencing foreign elections and revolutions, or by supporting and/or administering torture and death. Mark Weisbrot, an American economist and founder of the think-tank, ’The Centre for Economic and Policy Research,’ is quoted as saying, “in a number of countries, including Venezuela and Bolivia, USAID is acting more as an agency involved in covert action, like the CIA, than as an aid or development agency.” In an April 2014 article, William Blum, former US State Department employee, now author and historian, wrote, “the grandly-named Agency for International Development does not have an honourable history; this can perhaps be captured by a couple of examples: In 1981, the agency’s director, John Gilligan, stated, ‘at one time, many USAID field-offices were infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people. The idea was to plant operatives in every kind of activity we had overseas, government, volunteer, religious, every kind.’ On June 21st 2012, the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) issued a resolution calling for the immediate expulsion of USAID from their nine-member countries, ‘due to the fact that we consider their presence and actions to constitute an interference which threatens the sovereignty and stability of our nations.’ USAID, the CIA… together or singly, continue to be present at regime-changes, or attempts at same, favourable to Washington, from ‘colour revolutions’ to ‘spring’ uprisings, producing a large measure of chaos and suffering…”

So there you have it… just some events there from 2014, a year that ended with a few notable (and significant) words from Pop’s much-maligned ‘dark priestess,’ Madonna. During a Q&A-session with the music-magazine/website, ‘Rolling Stone,’ she revealed the inspiration behind six new tracks that, she claims, she was forced to rush-release after “unfinished” versions were leaked online without her permission. One of them is titled, ’Illuminati.’ In it, you can hear her state, “it‘s not Jay-Z and Beyonce; It‘s not Nicki or Lil Wayne; It‘s not Oprah and Obama; the Pope and Rihanna; Queen Elizabeth or Kanye. It‘s not pentagrams or witchcraft; It‘s not triangles or stacks of cash; Black magic or Gaga, Gucci or Prada. The all-seeing eye is watching tonight, that‘s what it is; Truth in the Light. Nothing to hide, secrets in sight.” You can check out the lyrics in full here:

“People are always using the word Illuminati but they’re always referencing it in the wrong way,” she opined to ‘Rolling Stone.’ “People often accuse me of being a member of the Illuminati and I think in today’s Pop-culture the Illuminati is perceived as a group of powerful, successful people who are working behind the scenes to control the universe. Not people with consciousness, not people who are enlightened. So people were accusing me of being a member of the Illuminati, and I kept going, wait – so first I had to figure out what that meant. Madonna 2014I know who the real Illuminati are, and I know where the word comes from. The real Illuminati were a group of scientists, artists, philosophers, writers, who came about in what is referred to as the Age of Enlightenment, after the Dark Ages, when there was no writing and no art and no creativity and no spirituality, and life was really at a standstill. And right after that, everything flourished. So we had people like Shakespeare and Leonardo Da Vinci and Michaelangelo and Isaac Newton, and all these great minds and great thinkers, and they were called Illuminati… They were illuminating people. It had nothing to do with money and power. Of course they were powerful, because they influenced people. But their goal was to inspire and enlighten. So when people refer to me as a member of the Illuminati, I always want to say, ’thank you. Thank you for putting me in that category.’ But before I can say ‘thank you,’ I feel like I had to write a song about what I believe the Illuminati to be, and what it isn‘t.” She most certainly wasn’t the only celebrity and oft-alleged ‘Illuminati stooge’ to comment publicly in 2014 on this notorious secret society, and – again – ‘Rolling Stone’ was there to document it. Katy-Perry-Rolling-Stone-Cover-August-2014In one of its summer editions, Popstress, Katy Perry was quoted as saying, “listen, if the Illuminati exist, I would like to be invited! I see all that s**t, and I’m like, ’come on, let me in! I want to be in the club!’ I guess you’ve kind of made it when they think you’re in the Illuminati. But listen, I believe in aliens, so if people want to believe in Illuminati, great.“ She claimed to have “no idea what it is. It sounds crazy. Weird people on the internet that have nothing to do find, like, strange triangles in your hand-motions.”

On the subject of “triangles” and “hand-motions” briefly, movie-actor and comedian, Jim Carrey gave us a new comedic interpretation of – for want of a better term – ‘Illuminati symbolism’ when he appeared on the US TV chat-show, ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live’ last year…

Jim Carrey's Secret Hand Signal5

When Kimmel asked him what the unusual signal meant, Carrey – to laughs from the studio-audience – replied, “you don’t know what that is? Come on, Jimmy. Seriously. The time is up. People are hip to this kind of stuff. I’m here tonight to blow the lid off it, to be the whistleblower. I’m sick and tired of the secrets and the lies. It is the secret symbol of the Illuminati… and it is the ‘all-mocking tongue.’ And I’m sick of it. I want everybody to be in on the joke, man. You know what I mean? For years now, talk-show hosts, people on television, people on sitcoms, have been hired by the Government to throw you off the track – to distract you, to make you laugh… make you happy and docile so you don’t know what’s really going on.” If you haven‘t yet seen it, take a look…

Actually, Carrey’s ’Kimmel’ appearance wasn’t the only occasion during 2014 when he publicly referred to “the Illuminati.” Here he is mentioning it in passing on ’Saturday Night Live’ during a skit parodying television-dating shows…

Judging by the comments left on blogs, forums, and chat-boxes amongst the more ‘Alternative-minded’ of us last year, opinion is divided as to what Carrey was aiming to achieve with these references. Was he mocking so-called ’conspiracy theorists’? Perhaps the intention was to cheapen and damage the credibility of, not only those of us who follow this line of research, but the very idea – the very possibility – that there do exist secret plots to control the masses? Or maybe – just maybe – he actually was whistleblowing, but secretly, through his characteristic brand of comedy?

Whatever the real reason was for Carrey’s public nod to ‘the Illuminati’ during 2014, one thing’s for sure, it’s no longer a subject exclusively discussed and debated on the fringes. As noted in a ‘Conspiro Media’ January 2014 article that reviewed events and happenings of 2013, this recent mainstream-media acknowledgement has been slowly brewing and growing for some time. So, it only stands to reason, there’ll be millions of people out there now who’re aware of this secret society – not from researchers, authors, journalists, and prominent speakers within the ’Truth circuit’ – but from the comments of globally-famous Pop-culture icons. Putting aside any questions or doubts as to what motivated these celebrities to respond to this subject in the way they did, there is of course an opportunity here for those of us with an interest in keeping abreast of the One World Agenda to take advantage of; We should be on hand in the face of this growing mass awareness, to guide and assist those who’ve been led to this point of consciousness by the likes of Carrey, Perry and Madonna and who are largely unfamiliar with the details of any grand (and very real) globalist conspiracy, to point them towards knowledge and information that we (you) believe to be credible and as reliable as possible (should they so ask or seek of course).

It’s appropriate then that ‘Conspiro Media’ is all set to follow-through with its much desired expansion now, because, as it stands, this site currently doesn’t possess the capacity to accommodate the rapid succession of events such as unfolded in 2014 – and hence why there’s been a serious lack of regularly updated material here in general actually (let alone in the last twelve months).

The overarching problem that’s contributed to the site’s shortage of frequent postings is… time. You see, in a genuine bid to deliver the most relevant, reliable and significant information possible, each article that’s available to see here will have been as a result of anywhere between a week to six month’s-worth of work. Most of this is spent on painstaking research (fact-finding, reference-hunting, cross-checking), and also – to a lesser extent – on the collating and arranging of all the relevant and useful data into a readable-enough format once it‘s been collected. Obviously, the priority is to get all this completed and published as soon as is possible. In order to achieve this however, one must apply a single-minded approach, and ultimately, at the cost of reporting on any breaking news-items and topics occurring in the meantime that might be relevant to this site.

The solution to this problem is… space. ‘Conspiro Media’ can – potentially – supply information on the latest news-events of relevance as and when they happen whilst continuing to deliver the usual, familiar heavily-researched articles as well, ideally, by moving away from the confines of the current web-address, ‘,’ to a more expansive location which can accommodate multiple pages of content more satisfactorily. It’s there (so it’s planned) you’ll be able to access a user-friendly menu-board that guides you towards the proposed ‘News Headlines’ area where you’ll be able to check out all the most recent developments, posted in a variety of forms, more often than not taken directly from outside-sourced reports (with the occasional additional commentary from ‘Conspiro Media‘ too) and complete with links straight to the sites they‘re lifted from. Meanwhile, the customary heavier articles will be published and available to read elsewhere in a separately-designated section of their own. All this should (it’s hoped) ensure that there’ll always be something fresh to see whenever you should choose to come and take a look. Also, don’t forget about the inclusion of an area dedicated to showcasing conscious-minded music-artists, so, please, if you’re a singer, rapper, musician, producer/remixer/DJ who has something meaningful to share, do get in touch and pass on your details, either by adding them to the ’comments’ section (via the speech-bubble at the top of this post) or by e-mail (contact, me – Matt Sergiou – at

It should be pointed out that this proposed expansion is currently in the very, very early planning stages. There have been discussions with one or two web-designers as to how this idea can be transformed into a reality, but that‘s as far as it‘s gone to date, so, it’ll be sometime yet before we’ll see the finished result – it could take three months, maybe six, perhaps twelve (the sooner the better, preferably). I sincerely hope you’ll keep checking back for any new articles that’ll be posted here in the meantime though – even if they are somewhat infrequent.


3 thoughts on “Here’s a review of events from 2014 and a look ahead at what’s in store for ‘Conspiro Media’ in 2015 and beyond…

  1. Sounds good!This kind of research has absoloutely exploded in last few years since many of us began taking an interest in it.Imagine looking at the entertainment world without some knowledge of these hidden areas-must be a bewildering experience.Of course many will now have a flimsy knowledge of this picked up from the tabloids which will give them little of any real insight.

    Just thought I’d share some related events and trends which I’ve been mulling over in last while.Firstly the way some sections of the media have ran with the idea of ISIS having two Beatles executioners is rather distasteful to say the least.”Beatle John” has been promoted heavily-sickening that this would be given space on front pages given Lennon’s tireless crusade for peace.of course they will drag the Beatles into practically anything with the similarly blood-thisrty Manson murders springing to mind.Of course we’re aware of the occult Beatles theories with new angles seeming to come to light all the time when you closely examining their story.Just read “Lennon-The Life”,a mighty tome about him which gave me a deeper knowledge and understanding of the man.Came away from it with more of a positive view of Yoko Ono and her influence of Lennon’s post Beatles activism.Without her support I’m sure he wouldn’t have been anywhere near as effective-and it’s clear they were an important voice for many worthwhile causes from this period.

    Something else that has preocupied me is the sheer amount of celebrity offspring that are infiltrating the entertainment world.It seems like it’s a closed shop-celeb parents mean you will have the connections,money,time and possibly genetics to glide seamlessly into this world.It’s getting silly-the singer from new pop rock sensations The 1975 is found to be the son of Denise Welch and Tim Healey while Pixie Geldoff is being groomed for a singing career in the Amy Winehouse mould.Even the son of Shane Ritchie and a Nolan sister is being touted as having a record deal-heaven forbid.In modelling the next Kate Moss is the offspring of Jagger and Jerry Hall-even saw a picture of Boris Becker’s illegitimate daughter strutting the catwalks.Doubt if her looks alone would have been enough to get her there.Given the power over the masses this celebrity world exerts it’s not hard to see all sorts of sinister angles to this not entirely new phenomena.Might be a subject worthy of investigation from any erstwhile researchers of the subject!

    The furore over The Interview film shows how important celebrity is to injecting a meme into the media.Take out the A-list celeb involvement and the masses aren’t going to give it a second glance-add it and it’ll run and run.Clearly the social controllers will step up their use of these puppets to mind manipulate the public and as they attempt to further impement their agenda.
    Of course this year will see more the abuse scandals mentioned with Westminster surely going to be rocked to it’s foundations.How can anyone dismiss people as “conspiracy theorists” when the Govt of Thatcher had all this going on in it with a very tiny mention ever seeping out into the media.Add to that the fact that many major peices of health advice given have shown to be bogus and detrimental and one must ask will anyone ever be able to trust a thing they say again?

    Anyway-looking forward to reading what you put out in 2015.Im sure they will be plenty to dissect!

    • Thanks for getting in touch, johny!
      Wow! Where do I start?!
      The Lennon book you read… was that by Philip Norman? If it is, then I know the book you’re referring to. I read that myself some time back. Can’t remember much about it now, although I’m quite sure much of it is stored in my subconscious. Norman is -for sure – an old hand at this. I remember reading his Beatles biography ‘Shout!’ back in the early eighties…. a relevant book for its time although it’s now been superseded by Mark Lewisohn’s new epic Beatles biog, ‘Tune In.’ More than a thousand pages long, it only goes up to 1962 when they signed their EMI contract. It’s a three-part series, and Part 2 isn’t likely to come out for another nine years (thanks to all the research that’s required). Haven’t yet begun to read it, although I’m safe in the knowledge that I’ve got a decade to get through it!

      Anyway… I digress… Philip Norman was responsible for resurrecting all the questions surrounding the ‘Redlands’ bust and the notorious ‘Acid King’ / intel asset, David Schneiderman (Sniderman / Jove… take your pick). He interviewed “Schneiderman’s” ex-wife, Maggie Abbott about all this for his book. Sufficed to say, this came in use for my Rolling Stones retrospective.

      Can’t say I share your confidence regarding Yoko Ono by the way (the self-proclaimed “witch”). Many people who were close to the Lennons have painted her as a cold manipulator who had John under her spell – literally. If we’re to believe these accounts, then it would appear that she used every trick up her sleeve to keep her husband under her control – including hypnosis. This of course then brings in the ‘MK’ element – especially when you tie this all in to her aristocratic background (having been born into one of the most powerful banking families in Japan). There is of course an argument that far from inspiring John’s peace efforts, what she did was kill them, effectively by encouraging him to become ‘the world’s clown’ instead of a force to be taken seriously (for example, by lying in a bed, or sitting in a sack, or filming bare bottoms). Had she not have been around, would he have used his intellect and powerful image in a more effective way to push through the ‘peace’ message? Was she ‘introduced’ into the picture purely to cheapen his power… and to prise him away from what was one of the most powerful partnerships in modern-day culture i.e. The Beatles? There’s evidence to suggest that some of this might’ve been the case. John’s former mistress, May Pang, has some interesting things to say about Yoko – as do many others who were close to them – and a lot of it points towards some kind of MK programming.
      As for The Beatles… Yes. There are many weird and wonderful theories out there, and they seem to grow by the day. The whole Manson thing is interesting… Was ‘Charlie’ inspired to send his so-called ‘Family’ out to kill because of ‘Helter Skelter’? Well, given that this theory was practically thought-up by prosecuting attorney Vincent Bugliosi should ring some alarm bells in itself. This is the same man who decades later would write a book arguing that JFK was indeed shot by Oswald – and who wasn’t part of a greater plot involving figures of power, e.t.c.
      If – and I mean – IF Manson did employ the ‘Helter Skelter’ song, then – and this is merely conjecture – then I think it was more as a mind-control instrument – a trigger, if you like – with him as the controller. I think there’s some info to suggest that Manson was either MKed himself or was close to people and places where this kinda stuff was happening.
      Of course, now – here in 2015 – in amongst all this ‘ISIS’ nonsense, The Beatles appear once again. Thanks for your thoughts on this. It gave me a new outlook. Actually, there was something else that occurred last year of a dark nature that was linked to this band again (in some shape or form). It’s to do with an English businessman who supposedly committed suicide last year by jumping to his death from a house in London. It turns out, this happened next door to the very house that Ringo Starr owned the lease of during the 1960s. Hendrix had lived there for a time, as did Lennon. In fact, he was busted there along with Yoko in the late Sixties. It’s since been claimed that the “suicide” victim might’ve been pushed to his death. Turns out he was embroiled with the Russian mafia – hence his death (allegedly). What caught my attention was that this guy died (or was murdered) on December 8th – the date of Lennon’s assassination… 34 years to the day…

      Funny you should mention the subject of celebrity offspring by the way, because I’ve been thinking about this a bit more recently too – but purely due to accident, not design. It’s just that, it seems that whenever I check out a celebrity’s bio these days (from whatever walk of life or choice of career – from Pop-star to celebrity chef), it seems to turn out that the celeb is either the son or daughter, or niece or nephew, or grand-kid of someone else who’s famous or well-connected to the media. And it does seem to be getting more and more commonplace, although it’s nothing new. Question is, are the offspring merely being given celeb status due to their elders’ influence to get them work, or is it due to bloodline and keeping people in positions of influence where they can continue to dope the masses? I mean, you mention Jagger and Jerry Hall’s daughter. Now – at the danger at coming across a bit nasty here – the girl is by no means ‘a looker,’ but there she is plastered all over the TV – gapped teeth and all: “get the London look.” UUrrghhh!!!! No, ta!… ‘Get a dentist’ more like!

      Actually, this brings me onto Chloe Maddeley.

      Chloe Maddeley!!????

      Yes… the celeb offspring of chat-show legends, Richard & Judy.

      Don’t know if you recall this, but she was in the news last year after she claimed she’d been stalked and bullied by trolls on the internet. Such was her pain and hurt (apparently), that she and her father called on the government to introduce new internet laws to stem this. Now, maybe I’m being paranoid here, but – again – this is merely conjecture – but, 2014 was quite a year for news-stories about celebrities being ‘stalked’ by ‘internet trolls’ on their Twitter pages or on FaceBook. There were stories about this almost on a continuous, daily basis. 2014 was also a year that saw the issue of internet security and trolling becoming something of a hot topic away from the moans and groans of celebrities. It was the year – after all – that David Cameron gave a speech at the UN about the need to put a stop to ‘non-violent extremists’ on the internet who blame the Jews for 9/11. It was highly odd that he would refer to Jews when mentioning 9/11 conspiracy theories (after all, this isn’t the main crux of the Alternative community’s issues regarding this false-flag), but, now we’ve had all the controversy regarding Charlie Hebdo too and the alleged rise in ‘anti-Semitism,’ I wonder what is actually going on here really. I mean, it did seem rather timely that the internet trolling debate, the calls to change internet laws accordingly, and Cameron’s speech would all appear to come at the same time. If I’m not mistaken, Chloe Maddeley’s ‘trolling trauma’ resulted in the potential introduction of new legislation that – if passed in Parliament – could bring in new laws to put tighter grips on internet freedoms. Interestingly, it’s called ‘Chloe’s Law.’ Not sure if the legislation was ever passed. I did some research into this some time back – and from my findings – it seems that nothing has been introduced as yet. Interestingly, Chloe is quoted as saying, “the current law obviously needs to be reviewed. It needs to be accepted that physical threats should not fall under the ‘freedom of speech’ umbrella. It should be seen as online terrorism and it should be illegal.” Ouch! What’s also interesting is a claim that Richard Madeley and Justice Secretary, Chris Grayling (the man credited with wanting to introduce ‘Chloe’s Law’) are old school-friends. However, that’s according to a blog I read some time back and I haven’t been able to verify this in any shape or form. Even if this isn’t true, though, the Maddeley’s involvement in all this does seem a bit suss. The whole debacle surrounding the Sony ‘leaks’ and Korea’s alleged ‘involvement’ might just be another ingredient in this – you know?… to condition the masses to accept new internet blocks on freedoms.

      It’s a thought.

      Anyway, thanks for getting in touch, johny. And apologies for the delay in replying. As you can see, I had a lot to say re; your post…. I jus needed to find some spare time to get it all down!
      I look forward to your thoughts on these issues, if you have any.

  2. Alrite Matt-no problem always good to chew the fat from time to time.Of course I have a few thoughts on what you’ve posted-you will unsurprised to hear!

    First off the Lennon book which was indeed by Norman.As I said pretty exhaustive work which contained incidents in his life I wasn’t full aware of.On Yoko I must say I would’ve leant towards the mind controlling witch senario but after the book it occured to me that she may have been the perfect foil for him.Lennon after all was a seriously cookie guy with a lifelong love of the nonsensical and surreal as his acclaimed books indicate.He was also a lifelong user of all manner of intoxicants-simply put he was out there and this showed in the stunts that he and Yoko took part in.In any case I wouldn’t dismiss such things as the bed-in as merely frivolous escapades-both of them were aware of the need to get mass attention from such activities and then put the serious message out there.Indeed the amount of anti-establishment causes Lennon was supporting both openly and covertly is mind boggling.Just recently read that he financed the first published article of the conspiracy pioneer Mae Brussell.Given her research it’s clear Lennon was perhaps more aware and sympathetic to “conspiracy” issues than has ever been acknowledged.This would have been another area of his activism that would no doubt horrified the US political establishment-indeed on his death Brussell was quick to claim his shooting as a Govt operation.Incidently Brussell was discussing the war on Rock etc during the time these events were taking place-just listened to a broadcast in 1971 where she claimed the Manson murders must have been a military operation,given their professionalism,carried out to destroy the hippie movement.In summary the suspicions regarding Yoko must remain-but maybe she deserves something of a re-evaluation among the mass negativity she has seemingly always generated.

    On the Norman book itself-he discusses how it was originally intended as an official biog with Yoko’s cooperation.On presenting her with the finished manuscript she withdrew her support saying it had been “mean to John.” Indeed it was no soft soap affair with Norman talking about Lennon losing his temper with his father and threatening to have him killed and disposed of at sea-an episode that would see them never speak again until a death-bed phonecall.But for me the most jaw dropping information was the claim that Lennon had told several close friends and confidants that he regretted not having slept with his mother-something he outlined in the opening lines of his song “Mother.” I knew he was somewhat messed up but I had no idea the extent of the “issues” he had left over from his upbringing.

    In general the section on rise of The Beatles got me thinking.The band were callow young lads when they were sent to Hamburg with Larry Parnes having a hand in it-a somewhat shadowy figure.Hamburg was of course home to every vice known to man with the band,especially John,diving into enthusiatically.Interestingly the WWII bombing of Hamburg which killed tens of thousands was codenamed Gamora.After the war it became a literal Soddam and Gamora(with the autourities consent)from which would emerge the figureheads who would lead what some would term a new age sex and drugs movement.It was there The Beatles learned how to send a crowd wild-indeed it’s mentioned that their first Cavern appearances caused the crowd to react with an hysteria that was previously uncommon among the revellers of this time.

    Could The Beatles have continued into the 70’s? I doubt it-Lennon stated he had lost interest in his bandmates and that the bond he had with Paul was gone.Indeed it’s clear they were going in seperate directions with McCartney embracing the “straight” life and becoming completely absorbed into the mainstream.In any case he always was a fairly straight-laced charcater-somewhat cheesy with a love of what Lennon termed granny music.No,he would never have teamed up with Lennon to take on the turbulent issues of the time and was last seen perforing at the Grammys with Rihanna and that deluded idiot Kanye West.

    Talking of these nauseating back slapping affairs it was amusing to see the Grand Dame Madonna taking a tumble at last nights Brit Awards.Though things like this are an excuse to send the media obsessed with celeb triviality into meltdown and give them more ammunition for their distraction.

    Anyway hope this may have been of interest-any excuse for a bit of Beatles talk!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s